Almost all GPs view real world evidence as useful in their prescribing practices, with only 3% saying that real world evidence is not useful to them.
While no one type of real world evidence stands out to the majority of GPs as being the most useful, generally the types tested fall into two categories: those that are more useful to GPs and those that are less useful. This suggests that a combination of the three types of real world evidence tested is likely to have the greatest impact on GPs’ prescribing practices.
